-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 536
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Knapsack: Fix empty list of items #2350
Conversation
6d8caac
to
8706b8c
Compare
@@ -12,6 +12,17 @@ | |||
}, | |||
"expected": 0 | |||
}, | |||
{ | |||
"uuid": "3993a824-c20e-493d-b3c9-ee8a7753ee59", | |||
"reimplements": "a4d7d2f0-ad8a-460c-86f3-88ba709d41a7", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Do we need a re-implements when the expected generated test code shouldn't change?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Well, the CI tests fail if I change the existing test case 🤷
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It's technically a breaking change, so yeah the reimplements makes sense here I think.
@@ -12,6 +12,17 @@ | |||
}, | |||
"expected": 0 | |||
}, | |||
{ | |||
"uuid": "3993a824-c20e-493d-b3c9-ee8a7753ee59", | |||
"reimplements": "a4d7d2f0-ad8a-460c-86f3-88ba709d41a7", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It's technically a breaking change, so yeah the reimplements makes sense here I think.
No description provided.